Powered by Bravenet Bravenet Blog

Tag Board

marybeth: had fun browsing your pages. God Bless
www.al-anonalateen.org.mx: Río Niágara No. 27 Col. Cuauhtémoc06500 México D.F.Deleg. CuauhtémocApartado Postal 5-082
Annie: Hello Rachel! I was wondering what church you attend? I see religious themes on your blog but I was curious as to what church you actually attend.
Denise: What a wonderful gift of a freezer!Right now we can't really have a garden where we live due to flooding problems although we have considered rice! LOL! I like the graphics you create! You do them on Irfanview? Never heard of that. I make some really simple stuff on PSP but nothing really complicated. Not sure how to and never have the time to experiment.
Storm: Thanks for the comments on Islam in America Rachel. I have been speaking prophetically since 1999 on this issue. I hope others will read your comment and check out the link you left.
Realm: hi there
Korner: blog hopping
Bits & Pieces: hello...care to exchange link? if so let me know so I can add your link to my blog..tnx
Storm: OOOOOOOOh happy cleaning! take care and stop by
Denise: Enjoyed your blog!
oswald: Cool Site. Care to exchange links?
Connie: Happy Easter !
Storm: good to see you again!!!!!!!!! And good to be back in US for a season
Dee: 3-12-08- Just wanted to surf by and say Hello and wish you a lovely week!
Dee: Just out sharing some Love this 1st day of February. Wishing you love & happy times everyday of the year.
Dee: Good morning, my friend. I wanted to drop by and say Howdy. Thanks so much for your happy tag that you left in my journal. You made smile. :) I enjoyed my visit here as always. I wish you a fabulous rest of the day!
Connie: Thank you for your comments for for being part of the Ron Paul revolution!
Connie: Enjoyed all the photos here. Nice photos of your parents.
Louise: Beautiful Site, loved the kitten pic - was the first time I've visited :)
Denise: Enjoyed reading your journal.Hope you are soon feeling better.
mandi791: Happy Blogging :)
Darlene: blog hopping. Very neat site you have here. Have a blessed night!
Garf: care to exchange link?
Corina: Hi there - just passing through...Been a little while since I passed by this way. How is everything going? God bless!
Joanne Troppello: Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I added your blog to my friend's list and I checked out your website and thought it was interesting and I hope you don't mind that I added it to my website links.
Joanne Troppello: Hi. Thanks for stopping by my blog. I've tried the collloidal silver before and it works, as you suggested. I'll have to check out your other two suggestions as well. Thanks,
Joanne Troppello: Hi. Just blog hopping. I like your site.
lutchi: Blog hopping, you have a great looking blog here and I enjoyed my visit. Please visit me soon when u have the chance.
naturalskeptic: Hi! Just blogging by! I enjoyed reading your entries!
Corina: Prayer for today:May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace as you trust in him, so that you may overflow with hope by the power of the Holy Spirit. Romans 15:13 (NIV)
Ravi Philemon: Sneak Peek. Visit us as well.
Joanne Troppello: Hi. Your profile mentions that some of your likes are herbology and natural healing. I have started to get interested in those topics as well. My husband and I currently shop at Wholefoods for organic food and we are trying to eat healthier. Are you aware of any natural healing books that are pretty detailed and by a well respected author? I'm in the market to buy something like that.
corina: hi. I've been visiting blogs which came up in a search, I done under "Christian"...May the peace of God be with you. God Bless.
Jackie: Great blog that you have here. I'm into collecting snags. Just one of my interests. I am also a Christian lady!
Brandon Doyle: Just out blog surfing. Cool blog.
Connie: HAPPY NEW YEAR !
RACHEL: Merry Christmas!!
Storm: As usual, great reading! Anything chocolate works for me ... yummmmmmm Have a GOD day!
Gene: Tell Dillard to be ready to pick me up today! I called on my cell in the bathroom but you didn't answer!
Gene: Well, Im at school and ran across this on google when searching for Bravenet stuff for class. Tag!
Sevy: Hi --------------------------------------- Have a super day !!
Connie: Happy Thanksgiving !
Moonifa: ok! Well just after posting another tag and the page reloading I see that all the mixed up mess IS still here. Sigh.
Moonifa: LOL It's getting there! I have to admit it's cleaned up a lot. Again I do apologize to all of you for this snafu.
Moonifa: I don't know whats going on here but I hope it's fixed soon. Bravnet just did an upgrade and theres afew bugs LOL Sorry about that but it's temporary LOL
lakieta: hey i like your site i have one to you can come and see it i hop you had i good week i on i had god is so good to us and he loves us anyway i hop you come and see me soon take care and god bless bye4 now
Storm: >> hahahahah thanks for the head banging--I knew there was a reason for the headache I hope you visited the website and saw the awesome stuff that is going on--especially the brochure! Thanks for the prayers and concern too.
Denise: Hello! Just blog hopping! have a great day!
Sevy: Hi Rachel ----------------------------------- Have a super day !!!
Numa: Numa
kim jin: Hello!

Please type in the four characters shown in the black box.

Friday, November 6th 2009

9:38 AM

Ft. Hood

My heart was in my throat when this story first broke. My son had just arrived back in the states from Iraq, and his base is Ft. Hood. Bless my son for calling me straight away to let me know he was okay. He had been given two days to take care of business and running his errands. He wasn't even on the base and was not sure if he might have to get a hotel room last night. (I still don't know if he did or not as it was late when the base came out of lockdown).

My thoughts may or may not be very popular, but since 9/11 I have dug deep into Islam. I do not see Hasan as the problem. This Muslim is only a symptom of the real problem. A total failure of our government and news media to learn what Islam really is, and a total failure to educate the masses. I have watched the news footage of Bush and Blair and other noted "leaders" spew forth about Islam being a religion of peace and that it's only the few radicals that do the violence. Stupid stupid people!!!!! They are about peace, that is true. But their idea of peace and our idea of peace are two totally different things. Their idea of peace is when everyone is under their rule and living under Sharia.

Islam is not a system of religion. Many Westerners fail to grasp that. Islam is a WAY OF LIFE. It has religion, but it's also government, culture and traditions peculiar to Islam. It is perfectly legal for them to lie to a non-Muslim. They can say anything to appease you, all the while plotting when to use the knife in your back. Our founding fathers were well aware of them. They called them Mohetmans in their writings. It is because of them that they argued passionately over giving unbridled freedom of religion. Some who argued against freedom of religion, did so out of concern that the Mohetmans could take advantage of this someday. Others disagreed, and in the end it was felt that Americans would never be so stupid as to ever allow them into our country, or stupid enough to ever let Christianity be usurped as the dominant religion. Oops.

Our ignorant leaders and ignorant populace are the real problem. When it is understood that Islam is not mainly about religion, that it is all about dominance and control, then, maybe then, the real solution of banning Muslims and their way of life known as Islam can effectively be eradicated from our soil. God help us all.
0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Tuesday, November 3rd 2009

8:42 AM

Fight it NOW!







Call To Action

COMMENT:  The first thing a newly elected congressman does when he or she arrives in Washington is to raise his or her hand to say that "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States Constitution..." I believe that this bill is unconstitutional on its face.  How does the government get away with telling us that we have to buy health insurance and then fine us if we don't?  Is is a stretch to say that a vote for this travesty is a violation of that sacred oath?

The first votes on Obama-Reid-Pelosi health care bills could come as early as this week--in fact the Pelosi may schedule a House vote on Thursday.  Folks, this is for all the marbles.  We MUST do everything in our power to STOP these bills in their tracks.  We want all our Tennessee congressmen to vote NO.   Please take a few minutes to view the videos below.  Note that Cong. Bachmann is urging folks to come to Washington if at all possible to make a 'HOUSE CALL' on Thursday.  In addition to 'action', please make this a matter of prayer. If the government gains control of America's health care we will end up with limited access, rationed care, more aborted babies and the government will be greatly expanded.

We are targeting Democrat Congressman.  If your TN Congressman is Lincoln Davis, Jim Cooper, Bart Gordon, John Tanner or Steve Cohen, PLEASE go HERE to send them an email.  Better still, go
HERE to find their phone numbers and CALL THEM.
Out-of-states subscribers, go
HERE to find your congressman.

CBO Estimates House Bill Cost at $1.055 Trillion

The Congressional Budget Office said Thursday the U.S. House health-care system reform has a price tag $1.055 trillion. The hefty estimate also does not include $245 billion needed to stop Medicare payments to doctors from decreasing, according to a nastaq.com report

Let Your Voice Be Heard: A Message From Congressman Mike Pence

Sen. Tom Coburn, M.D., On Health Care Reform

Chairman Tom Price Says This is a Health Care Bill We Can't Afford



Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) On the Health Care Takeover by By Government



H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act
(This is Pelosi's newest version.)
Read bill
HERE;  Read Background and Executive Summary HERE.
Go
HERE
to read about the Boards, bureaucracies, commissions and program created in H.R.3962

Page 110 of H.R. 3962, the 
Affordable Health Care for America Act, authorizes a new government health insurance program to pay for all elective abortions. Read more here.  

2 Percent Would Reportedly take the Public Option
The estimated share of Americans younger than 65 who'd sign up for the public option plan under the health care bill that Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is steering toward House approval would be used by 2 percent of the population.
Read more here.

45% of Doctors Would Consider Quitting If Congress Passes Health Care Overhaul
Two of every three practicing physicians oppose the medical overhaul plan under consideration in Washington, and hundreds of thousands would think about shutting down their practices or retiring early if it were adopted, a new IBD/TIPP Poll has found.
Read more here


The Worst Bill Ever

PelosiEpic new spending and taxes, pricier insurance, rationed care, dishonest accounting: The Pelosi health bill has it all.

 

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has reportedly told fellow Democrats that she's prepared to lose seats in 2010 if that's what it takes to pass ObamaCare, and little wonder. The health bill she unwrapped last Thursday, which President Obama hailed as a "critical milestone," may well be the worst piece of post-New Deal legislation ever introduced.

In a rational political world, this 1,990-page runaway train would have been derailed months ago. With spending and debt already at record peacetime levels, the bill creates a new and probably unrepealable middle-class entitlement that is designed to expand over time. Taxes will need to rise precipitously, even as ObamaCare so dramatically expands government control of health care that eventually all medicine will be rationed via politics.

Yet at this point, Democrats have dumped any pretense of genuine bipartisan "reform" and moved into the realm of pure power politics as they race against the unpopularity of their own agenda. The goal is to ram through whatever income-redistribution scheme they can claim to be "universal coverage." The result will be destructive on every level—for the health-care system, for the country's fiscal condition, and ultimately for American freedom and prosperity.

•The spending surge. The Congressional Budget Office figures the House program will cost $1.055 trillion over a decade, which while far above the $829 billion net cost that Mrs. Pelosi fed to credulous reporters is still a low-ball estimate. Most of the money goes into government-run "exchanges" where people earning between 150% and 400% of the poverty level—that is, up to about $96,000 for a family of four in 2016—could buy coverage at heavily subsidized rates, tied to income. The government would pay for 93% of insurance costs for a family making $42,000, 72% for another making $78,000, and so forth.

At least at first, these benefits would be offered only to those whose employers don't provide insurance or work for small businesses with 100 or fewer workers. The taxpayer costs would be far higher if not for this "firewall"—which is sure to cave in when people see the deal their neighbors are getting on "free" health care. Mrs. Pelosi knows this, like everyone else in Washington.

Even so, the House disguises hundreds of billions of dollars in additional costs with budget gimmicks. It "pays for" about six years of program with a decade of revenue, with the heaviest costs concentrated in the second five years. The House also pretends Medicare payments to doctors will be cut by 21.5% next year and deeper after that, "saving" about $250 billion. ObamaCare will be lucky to cost under $2 trillion over 10 years; it will grow more after that.

• Expanding Medicaid, gutting private Medicare. All this is particularly reckless given the unfunded liabilities of Medicare—now north of $37 trillion over 75 years. Mrs. Pelosi wants to steal $426 billion from future Medicare spending to "pay for" universal coverage. While Medicare's price controls on doctors and hospitals are certain to be tightened, the only cut that is a sure thing in practice is gutting Medicare Advantage to the tune of $170 billion. Democrats loathe this program because it gives one of out five seniors private insurance options.

As for Medicaid, the House will expand eligibility to everyone below 150% of the poverty level, meaning that some 15 million new people will be added to the rolls as private insurance gets crowded out at a cost of $425 billion. A decade from now more than a quarter of the population will be on a program originally intended for poor women, children and the disabled.

Even though the House will assume 91% of the "matching rate" for this joint state-federal program—up from today's 57%—governors would still be forced to take on $34 billion in new burdens when budgets from Albany to Sacramento are in fiscal collapse. Washington's budget will collapse too, if anything like the House bill passes.

• European levels of taxation. All told, the House favors $572 billion in new taxes, mostly by imposing a 5.4-percentage-point "surcharge" on joint filers earning over $1 million, $500,000 for singles. This tax will raise the top marginal rate to 45% in 2011 from 39.6% when the Bush tax cuts expire—not counting state income taxes and the phase-out of certain deductions and exemptions. The burden will mostly fall on the small businesses that have organized as Subchapter S or limited liability corporations, since the truly wealthy won't have any difficulty sheltering their incomes.

This surtax could hit ever more earners because, like the alternative minimum tax, it isn't indexed for inflation. Yet it still won't be nearly enough. Even if Congress had confiscated 100% of the taxable income of people earning over $500,000 in the boom year of 2006, it would have only raised $1.3 trillion. When Democrats end up soaking the middle class, perhaps via the European-style value-added tax that Mrs. Pelosi has endorsed, they'll claim the deficits that they created made them do it.

Under another new tax, businesses would have to surrender 8% of their payroll to government if they don't offer insurance or pay at least 72.5% of their workers' premiums, which eat into wages. Such "play or pay" taxes always become "pay or pay" and will rise over time, with severe consequences for hiring, job creation and ultimately growth. While the U.S. already has one of the highest corporate income tax rates in the world, Democrats are on the way to creating a high structural unemployment rate, much as Europe has done by expanding its welfare states.

Meanwhile, a tax equal to 2.5% of adjusted gross income will also be imposed on some 18 million people who CBO expects still won't buy insurance in 2019. Democrats could make this penalty even higher, but that is politically unacceptable, or they could make the subsidies even higher, but that would expose the (already ludicrous) illusion that ObamaCare will reduce the deficit.

• The insurance takeover. A new "health choices commissioner" will decide what counts as "essential benefits," which all insurers will have to offer as first-dollar coverage. Private insurers will also be told how much they are allowed to charge even as they will have to offer coverage at virtually the same price to anyone who applies, regardless of health status or medical history.

The cost of insurance, naturally, will skyrocket. The insurer WellPoint estimates based on its own market data that some premiums in the individual market will triple under these new burdens. The same is likely to prove true for the employer-sponsored plans that provide private coverage to about 177 million people today. Over time, the new mandates will apply to all contracts, including for the large businesses currently given a safe harbor from bureaucratic tampering under a 1974 law called Erisa. Read more here.





0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Saturday, October 31st 2009

7:34 AM

Happy Halloween!

For the first time I have no kids that will be trick or treating this year! Sidney decided several months ago that he was too big to do that anymore. I agree, he is. He turned 14 this summer. I am proud that he recognized that fact without any prompting from me. But I will miss it. And since I don't work tonight, my co-workers will be spared my witch costume. No less than two purple wigs with the traditional hat and flashing bat earrings LOL. Maybe next year! For now I have some cute photos to share with you. I never cease to be amazed at people's artistic and creative abilities.
































































I thought the last one was especially cute.

But my penchant for saving the best for last,....GENE IS COMING HOME!!!!! In less than a week Gene will be back from Iraq!!!!! I thank God for protecting him and I rejoice over his homecoming. Fall has always been one of my favorite seasons, and Thanksgiving my favorite holiday. We are mightily blessed indeed. Lord willing, Gene will be here for Thanksgiving.

May God keep you and your richly blessed!

0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Saturday, October 31st 2009

6:43 AM

Common Links In Swine Flu Deaths

Common Links in Swine Flu Deaths...
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
October 31 2009 17,897 views

staphylococcus aureusA recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that of the 36 children who died from H1N1 from April to August, six had no chronic health conditions. But all of them had a co-occurring bacterial infection.

The most common co-occurring infection that causes flu-related deaths is staphylococcus aureus. A third of the population carries it, most in their nose or on their skin.

The flu causes upper respiratory damage, which allows the staph to make its way into the lungs.


Sources:
Dr. Mercola''s Comments
Dr. Mercola's Comments:

This is exactly what I was referring to in Wednesday’s special swine flu alert. If you missed it, I urge you to take a moment to review it now. It received over 80,000 views within hours of being published.

In it, I discussed the prevailing propaganda being streamed through popularTV programslike 60-Minutes.

60-Minutes’ Story Also Highlighted Bacterial Infection as Flu Tragedy

Their segment, which aired last Sunday, did ask some hard questions to the Assistant Surgeon General. But they didn't ask why CDC officials persist in telling the public that this H1N1 strain of influenza is quite dangerous when the experience of those in the southern hemisphere (which just finished their flu season) is in direct conflict with what the CDC is telling the American people.

And, just like most of the mainstream media, 60-Minutes did not ask some of the most essential questions that need to be answered if you are to understand what is really going on with this "pandemic."

The issue of coexisting bacterial infections is one of those questions that need to be looked at more closely.

Their segment followed the story of a young high school football player who was infected with the H1N1 virus, received some form of medication for his flu symptoms, and then quickly developed a life-threatening staph infection in his lungs.

However, no questions were asked about what type of medication he received, even though it was clear that, after recovering slightly, he then quickly deteriorated after receiving the medication.

There was also no mention of whether the teen had already been vaccinated for seasonal or H1N1 influenza, either recently or in the past years.

A Canadian preliminary study is provocative in that it suggests that those who have gotten seasonal influenza vaccine in the past may be at greater risk for getting H1N1 and having complications.

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is calling for a comparison of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals for all health outcomes, and I believe it would be prudent to do so.

After all, in order for anyone to make an informed decision about vaccines, you need to have certain facts at hand, not conjecture stating that something is "believed to be safe" even though it has never been studied!

Why Aren’t These Important Questions Being Asked?

So far 81 children have died from H1N1 in the US. The death of any child is tragic. However, using these deaths to potentially harm countless others who are not naturally at risk may be even worse.

Here are some of the questions that need honest answers, as they may paint an entirely different picture than what we are currently told by health officials and the media.

How many pediatric deaths occurred in children who:

  • Were positively lab confirmed as H1N1?

  • Had underlying chronic immune and brain dysfunction?

  • Were fully vaccinated according to CDC recommendations?

  • Had received influenza vaccine this year?

  • Had received seasonal influenza vaccine in previous years?

  • Received Tamiflu or another anti-viral prior to death?

  • Had a coinciding bacterial infection with H1N1?

  • Were never vaccinated - totally unvaccinated?

With only 81 sets of medical records to review, someone ought to be able to compile these statistics.

So far we know that, of the 36 children who died from H1N1 between April and August of this year, 30 had some form of chronic health condition, and all of them had a co-occurring bacterial infection.

Clearly, having a robust, well-functioning immune system is the best way to ensure your body’s innate ability to fight off this mild flu virus, and not succumb to secondary infections such as staphylococcus aureus.

I’d also like to know how many flu deaths might be attributed to antibiotic-resistant staph infections.

According to the Star Tribune, the most common co-occurring infection that causes flu-related deaths is staphylococcus aureus, which is commonly found on your skin and in your nose. About a third of the population carries it.

Unfortunately, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, also known as MRSA, has become a serious public health problem, one that is getting progressively worse and actually exacts a greater death toll than "modern plagues" like AIDS.

Needless to say, we already know the reason for the ever increasing threat of MRSA – over use of antibiotics, both in medicine and conventional farming practices. It’s an entirely man-made problem, the answer to which is exercising RESTRAINT in the use of antibiotics, so that they can actually work when someone’s life is really on the line…

It could be of great value to have more facts about each of these H1N1 flu deaths.

But the fact still remains that flu vaccines will nearly always decrease your overall immune function, not enhance it!

Obese at Six Times Higher Risk from H1N1 Complications

Most authorities agree that the H1N1 variant virus is quite mild. The vast majority of people (99.99%) are having very brief and mild illnesses from this virus. And yet, some people do die from it -- some die each and every flu season. But who, and why?

 

Unfortunately, the media is not giving you the answers to these questions.

I will publish an excellent review, and a two-hour audio interview with Dr. Russell Blaylock on this issue on Tuesday, so please stay tuned! Because as he will explain in greater detail, 100 percent of those who have died had underlying health problems before they were infected.

 

In addition, one of the more powerful risk factors for being admitted to the ICU and of dying is obesity.

Turns out obese people are admitted 6x more often than those of normal weight. And obesity plays a significant role in the risk to children and pregnant women as well, something that has never been discussed by the media, the CDC or the public health officials.


According to Dr. Blaylock, one study found that 32.7% of those admitted to the ICU had asthma or other chronic pulmonary disease, far higher than the general population. 
Obesity is also associated with a high incidence of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, both of which would increase your risk of having a serious infection, even to mild viruses.

BEWARE: Taking Tylenol with the Flu Shot May Actually Make You Worse

 

According to two Czechoslovakian studies, published in the journal Lancet on October 17, giving your child an analgesic to prevent fever when getting a vaccine could make things worse.

Their studies showed that after vaccination, the immune response was lower among babies who were given acetaminophen (such as Tylenol), right after they received the shot.

The vaccines used in the study were for pneumococcal disease, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B, polio and rotavirus. No flu vaccines were included. However, it’s likely the effect would still be the same.

MSN.com quotes infectious disease expert Dr. Marc Siegel as saying that:

"…the conclusion that Tylenol not only suppresses fever, but also decreases immune response is plausible. After all, what is an immune response? It's an inflammatory response."

The researchers also found that although fewer infants developed a fever after getting acetaminophen, they also developed significantly fewer antibodies against the disease they were vaccinated against. They believe the acetaminophen’s anti-inflammatory activity might interfere with your body’s immune system antibody response, which could explain why the vaccine was rendered less effective.

However, what is not mentioned by either MSN, or foodconsumer.org, who also ran an article on these findings, is that a lowered immune response also means you're more susceptible to develop other infections. And, as we now know, it is secondary infections such as bacterial staph infections that turn out to be deadly -- not the flu virus in and of itself.

You Take Your Chances Either Way…

I also want to stress that you must remember that you are taking your chances either way, whether you get the flu shot or take your chances with the flu.

This year, flu deaths are trumpeted across the world, and yet people are also dying and suffering life-altering disabilities shortly after receiving the flu vaccine, whether it be the seasonal- or the H1N1 vaccine. (They’re claimed to be nearly identical anyway, so why would it matter which it is?)

For example, here are just a few recent stories that receive nowhere near the same amount of attention. In fact, most if not all, are being portrayed as unfortunate coincidences that have nothing to do with the fact they just received a flu shot, and no further investigations are made:

Remember, the medical industry ACCEPTS these occasional deaths as collateral damage during mass vaccinations and other drug interventions.

The question is, do you?

Flu Mortality, Unrelated to Vaccines, Has Been Down for Years

Also remember that the mortality rate of the swine flu is extremely low.

Dr. Ronald Whitmont, M.D. reports in a recent article of The Epoch Times:

"So far, H1N1 is much less severe than the regular flu. The calculated mortality rate for H1N1 in 2009 is only 0.5 percent.

In 2006, the death rate for influenza was 0.77 percent, and in 2005 it was 0.79 percent.

Of course, the CDC and the pharmaceutical industries claim credit for this reduction in death rate, but statistical analysis shows that this trend predated the introduction of the vaccine and is not correlated with either vaccine or antiviral medication use." [Emphasis mine.]

Unfortunately, no one knows what the mortality rate is within, say, two weeks of receiving a flu vaccine, because there’s no tracking method in place tracing each and every person who is vaccinated.

These are the kind of statistics that are sorely needed.

Dr. Mercola on FacebookHow to Prevent Flu the Natural Way

Please understand that there are effective ways to reduce your chances of ever getting the flu in the first place, without ever going near a vaccine.

H1N1 is a milder than normal flu bug, and it is the state of your immune system – not the virus itself – that determines whether or not you will get sick, even if you come in contact with the virus.

Following these simple guidelines can go a long way to help keep your immune system in optimal working order:

  • Optimize your vitamin D levels. This may be one of your most important strategies for maintaining optimal immune function against all disease, not just the flu. Vitamin D has been well documented to increase the production of over 200 antimicrobial peptides that fight infection.

  • Avoid Sugar. Sugar decreases the function of your immune system almost immediately, and as you likely know, a strong immune system is key to fighting off viruses and other illness. Be aware that sugar is present in foods you may not suspect, like ketchup and fruit juice.

  • Get Enough Rest. Just like it becomes harder for you to get your daily tasks done if you're tired, if your body is overly fatigued it will be harder for it to fight the flu. Be sure to check out my article Guide to a Good Night's Sleep for some great tips to help you get quality rest.

  • Don't Let Stress Become Overwhelming. We all face some stress everyday, but if stress becomes overwhelming then your body will be less able to fight off the flu and other illness.

    If you feel that stress is taking a toll on your health, consider using an energy psychology tool such as the Meridian Tapping Technique (MTT), which is remarkably effective in relieving stress associated with all kinds of events, from work to family to trauma. You can check out my free, 25-page MTT manual for some guidelines on how to perform it on yourself.

  • Exercise. When you exercise, you increase your circulation and your blood flow throughout your body. The components of your immune system are also better circulated, which means your immune system has a better chance of finding an illness before it spreads.

  • Take a good source of animal based omega-3 fats like Krill Oil. Increase your intake of healthy and essential fats like the omega-3 found in krill oil, which is crucial for maintaining health.

  • Wash Your Hands. Washing your hands will decrease your likelihood of spreading a virus to your nose, mouth or other people. Be sure you don't use antibacterial soap for this -- antibacterial soaps are completely unnecessary, and they cause far more harm than good. Instead, identify a simple chemical-free soap that you can switch your family to.

  • Take appropriate supplements like oil of oregano extract, propolis, olive leaf extract, elder flower extract, acerola, and DMG or effective homeopathic remedies.

    However you will need to educate yourself on the particular benefits of each BEFORE you purchase any supplements on that list.

    Any company that informs you of the actions of alternative remedies for H1N1 will be in violation of US Federal law. A newly created Swine Flu Task Force has been given the authority to shut the business down and even throw owners in jail.

    Violations of these new rules are being prosecuted even more aggressively than alternative cancer treatments! Earlier this week, Dr. Andrew Weil actually received an FDA/FTC warning letter that threatens jail time for failure to comply with the rules.

swine flu posters

You Can Make a Difference

Most polls show that we ARE making a difference because more people are becoming educated about influenza and flu vaccines, especially H1N1 swine flu. Recent national polls have revealed that 30 to 50% in many communities are not planning to get a swine flu shot. Those who haven't made up their minds yet have lots of questions. So we have created some posters that you can print and post ALL over your community, your local stores, office and schools.

0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Thursday, October 29th 2009

8:43 AM

Hallelujah!

 

TENNESSEE EAGLE FORUM WARNS OF THE DANGERS OF CALLING A CON CON. Tennessee Eagle Forum President Bobbie Patray testified in favor of a resolution to reassert "state sovereignty," and included warning about the dangers of calling a Con Con before a specially appointed committee this week. "Eagle Forum is a strong supporter of the 10th Amendment and believes the federal government has overstepped its bounds," she said, "but to call for a federal constitutional convention we feel is a very risky way to go about it in today's political climate." During the meeting when the subject of Con-Con came up, Sen. Henry mentioned that a number years ago he was involved in a national effort to promote the Con-Con, "until Eagle Forum rose up in all their fury" and shot it down!! Watch testimony starting at 22 minute mark.

COMMENT: A number of states introduced resolutions to support state sovereignty. At the end of the day it was only Tennessee  and Alaska that passed these resolutions and had them signed by the respective Governors. [See final language HERE sponsored and passed by Rep. Susan Lynn, R-Lebanon, see her Blog HERE on HJR 108]. As you will see from the articles below, the 'Committee of Conference and Correspondence' will be contacting other states and legislative organizations urging action on this important constitutional issue that does not include a Federal Constitutional Convention. Hopefully, the states and/or organizations can come up with some concrete suggestions for reasserting state sovereignty.  This is definitely something we will be following closely.

Go HERE to read the first draft of the letter to other states.


Tennessee legislative panel asserts 'state sovereignty' from feds

TN FlagNASHVILLE -- A Tennessee legislative committee on Tuesday moved the state to the forefront of efforts by conservatives to reassert "state sovereignty" and rein in the federal government for usurping its constitutional authority.

Acting on a resolution overwhelmingly approved by the legislature in May, a specially appointed "Committee of Conference and Correspondence" voted to send letters to the other 49 state legislatures, inviting them to join Tennessee in a "working group ... to enumerate the abuses of authority by the federal government and to seek repeal of its assumption of powers" and mandates it has imposed on states.

Only one other state -- Alaska -- has adopted a similar "state sovereignty" resolution being pushed nationally by the "tea party" movement and other conservative groups and pundits.

"We really are leaders on this," said Rep. Susan Lynn, R-Mt. Juliet, who sponsored House Joint Resolution 108 that set the events in motion.
Read more here.


State launches boycott of 'unconstitutional' federal laws
Urges 49 others to join in combating government's 'abuse of authority'

Posted: October 21, 2009
11:50 pm Eastern

By Chelsea Schilling
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Tennessee is urging 49 other states to come together and create a "joint working group between the states" to combat unconstitutional federal legislation and assert state rights.

Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen signed HJR 108, the State Sovereignty Resolution on June 23. According to the Tenth Amendment Center, the resolution created a committee to form a joint working group between the states to enumerate the abuses of authority by the federal government and seek repeal of imposed mandates.

State Rep. Susan Lynn recently wrote a letter to the other 49 state legislatures, inviting them to join the group and warning that the role of the federal government has been "blurred, bent and breached."

"The national government has become a complex system of programs whose purposes lie outside of the responsibilities of the enumerated powers and of securing our natural rights; programs that benefit some while others must pay," Lynn wrote. "Today, the federal government seeks to control the salaries of those employed by private business, to change the provisions of private of contracts, to nationalize banks, insurers and auto manufacturers, and to dictate to every person in the land what his or her medical choices will be."

She continued, "Forcing property from employers to provide healthcare, legislating what individuals are and are not entitled to, and using the labor of some so that others can receive money that they did not earn goes far beyond securing natural rights, and the enumerated powers in the Constitution."

Lynn said that the people created the federal government to be their agent only for certain enumerated purposes.

"The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people to the federal government, and also that which is absolutely necessary to advancing those powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution of the United States," she wrote. "The rest is to be handled by the state governments, or locally, by the people themselves."

She noted that the Constitution does not include a congressional power to override state laws, nor does it give the judicial branch unlimited jurisdiction over all matters. Attempts to include such provisions in the Constitution were rejected by the Founding Fathers.

"With this in mind," she wrote, "any federal attempt to legislate beyond the Constitutional limits of Congress' authority is a usurpation of state sovereignty – and unconstitutional. Governments and political leaders are best held accountable to the will of the people when government is local. The people of a state know what is best for them; authorities, potentially thousands of miles away, governing their lives is opposed to the very notion of freedom." Read more here.

0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Wednesday, October 28th 2009

8:42 AM

"Free" Health care? Really?

   If you think health care is expensive now, just wait until it is free!

Watch: Congress Wants You to Pay for Abortion as 'Health Care'

Please take a moment to view this hard-hitting TV ad warning about the dangers of implementing a government-run health care system.

If you want to make phone calls (preferred) go
HERE to find the appropriate phone numbers. However, you can also use our system to send an email.

Out-of-state subscribers can go
HERE to find your Senators; go HERE
to find your congressman.

Chamber rips Senate healthcare bill
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce formally warned lawmakers Tuesday that it intends to oppose an early version of healthcare reform legislation unless wholesale changes are made.
Read more here.



The Baucus ObamaCare bill is fatally flawed and unacceptable:

Seven Fatal Flaws of Baucus Bill

Not a Death Panel, a Death Mandate

Deny This: Guess Who Has the Highest Medical Claim Rejection Rate?



READ THE UNION HEALTH-CARE LABEL
The Senate version opens the door to implement forced unionization schemes pursued by former Govs. Rod Blagojevich of Illinois in 2005 and Gray Davis of California in 1999. Both men repaid tremendous political debts to Andy Stern and his Service Employees International Union (SEIU) by reclassifying state-reimbursed in-home health-care (and child-care) contractors as state employees—and forcing them to pay union dues.
Read more here.

Here are a few of the worst aspects of the current health care plan:

 
 

1.  It creates a "Public Option"It's hard to compete with "free."

 
This is a government run health care plan similar to Medicare that would compete with private insurers.  Most middle class Americans will not be able to afford the increased tax burden forced upon them in order to subsidize the "public option," in addition to their own private plan premiums.  Taxing private insurance will drive up costs stripping consumers of the freedom to choose government-free insurance and will they be forced into the initially "cheaper" public plan.
  

2.  The Plan Is Not "Free" — Americans Cannot Afford Another $1 Trillion Tax Increase.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the plan will cost $1 trillion
over ten years to insure only 16 million of the estimated 50 million "Americans" including 12-20 million illegal aliens who are currently uninsured.  This estimate is very conservative and does not even consider proposed Medicaid expansion, the actual cost of the "public option," the cost of employer mandates, the administrative costs of implementing the proposed program, and the effects on spending for other federal programs.
  

3.  It Imposes "Employer Mandates"Government Mandates Thwart Jobs Creation.

 
American businesses are having a difficult enough time keeping their doors open, the government should not be imposing excessive costs on employers, making it more expensive than ever to hire new workers by mandating that employers provide a certain level of insurance for their workers or be assessed fines.  This tactic incentivizes employers to drop their employees' pricey health plans and simply pay the less expensive fine, leaving many Americans without insurance and left with the limiting, government-run plan.
 
 
4. It requires "Individual Mandates" — Government Should Not Determine How Much Insurance You Must Buy. 
 
Every American would be required to buy a policy that meets certain minimum requirements.  Thus, a healthy young person who rarely uses his insurance policy would be required to buy a more expensive policy or else they'll be punished with hefty fines.  When people are required to pay for more insurance than they need or want, they will seek to get their money's worth, which will put even more demand on an already overextended system and will further drive up costs.
 
 
5.  Health Care Decisions Should be Between You and Your Doctor — Not Government Bureaucrats.
 
 
Part of the plan to "manage care" involves "Comparative Effectiveness Research," a method by which government bureaucrats will determine the most cost-effective treatments and will mandate those treatments.  In meetings with the American Medical Association, President Obama indicated that Comparative Effectiveness Research would be a defense for doctors against frivolous malpractice lawsuits.  Meaning, doctors would be forced to use one-size-fits-all government-prescribed treatments, and patients would have no recourse if those treatments fail or harm them.  Please note, Obama and his liberal allies are peddling this to the American people as tort reform, but it is no more than a cheap knock-off that further limits both doctors' and patients' freedom.  Do not be fooled, this is NOT tort reform. 
 

 

6.  ObamaCare is a simply a bloated HMO program.  This plan is deliberately designed so that over time, your only health care option is the government option!

 
Think about how unpleasant a trip to the DMV or any government office is and how frustrating all government bureaucracies are.  Imagine having to wait and wade through even more extensive red tape to deal with health care concerns. Limited resources will inevitably lead to long waits and health care rationing. 
 
 
In Massachusetts, America's first experiment with state-sponsored medicine, the average wait to see a family doctor is 63 days, 50 days for a specialist, and for women who believe they might be pregnant often must wait until their second-trimester to see an obstetrician! 
 
 
Reform in the health care industry is needed, but Obama's and congressional liberals' approach will only further contribute to the problems that already exist.  Rather than instituting a government-run option and decreasing healthy competition in the private sector, Congress should be considering ways to increase much-needed competition within private industry that drive costs down!

We need to overwhelm our congressmen's offices with contacts opposing this legislation that has the potential to devastate America's health care system, which is currently the finest in the world.  Faithful activists like you helped defeat HillaryCare in 1993, and we need your help again.  Legislators need to hear overwhelming cries against this radical, rushed-through legislation which will directly affect every American's health care.

7.  The proposed healthcare bill includes funding for abortion.

8.  The bill includes includes billons for 'parks, paths' and other pork.
0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Sunday, October 25th 2009

3:39 PM

Who do you believe? Obama or CBS?

I have felt since the very beginning that the Swine Flu "pandemic" was to be a man-made affair. One of the historic ploys used by tyrants through the ages has been to create a "problem", wait for the public "reaction", and then swoop in with the "solution".  I find it gratifying that right after Obama declares the national emergency, CBS reports that it isn't as bad as it's made out to be. But many of us have known this all along.

 However, take it seriously that Obama declared it a national emergency. This can have far reaching implications. How many are aware of Judge Carter standing ground in order to have Obama forced into revealing his true birth certificate? If Judge Carter doesn't disappear, or isn't assassinated, or scared off, for his stand for truth and justice, and IF by some miracle Obama doesn't sign the Copenhagen Treaty in December, (he has already said he will sign it, then it's bye bye USA and hello NWO), declaring a national emergency gives Obama the power to call martial law. When that happens, the chances of foreign troops being brought onto our soil is possible and highly likely. Obama is aware that much of our own law enforcement and military, will refuse to act against the American people. (Thank God for Oath Keepers)! So we aren't out of the woods yet. Forced vaccinations are still possible. Martial law being declared is as well.


Here is the CBS news segment dealing with the swine flu pandemic that isn't:


 




Watch CBS News Videos Online




Here is an excerpt from Dr. Mercola's website about the real truth behind the swine flu:

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states on their main flu Web site http://www.cdc.gov/flu/ that flu activity is increasing in the United States, with most states reporting "widespread influenza activity."

The CDC goes on to say, and I quote:

"So far, most flu is 2009 H1N1 flu (sometimes called "swine flu")."

But wait stop the presses.

A three-month-long investigation by CBS News, released earlier this week that  included state-by-state test results, revealed some very different facts. The CBS study found that H1N1 flu cases are NOT as prevalent as feared. A CBS article even states:

"If you've been diagnosed "probable" or "presumed" 2009 H1N1 or "swine flu" in recent months, you may be surprised to know this: odds are you didn't have H1N1 flu. In fact, you probably didn't have flu at all."

Obviously CBS News and the CDC are completely contradicting each other. So who is right?

Well, CBS reports that in late July 2009 the CDC advised states to STOP testing for H1N1 flu, and they also stopped counting individual cases.

Their rationale for this, according to CBS News, was that it was a waste of resources to test for H1N1 flu because it was already confirmed as an epidemic.

So just like that virtually every person who visited their physician with flu-like symptoms since late July was assumed to have H1N1, with no testing necessary because, after all, there's an epidemic.

It's interesting to note that at the same time as the CDC decided the H1N1 epidemic warranted no further testing for cases due to its epidemic status, Finnish health authorities actually downgraded the threat of swine flu.

In late July the health ministry and the National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) in Finland actually removed swine flu from a list of diseases considered dangerous to the public because the majority of cases recovered without medication or hospital care!

And, as the CDC continues to use fear to motivate and control Americans with their worst-case swine flu scenarios, they say nothing of the experience of those in the southern hemisphere, which just finished their flu season and found it was not as bad as expected.

CBS News Finds H1N1 Tests "Overwhelmingly Negative"

Before beginning their investigation, CBS News asked the CDC for state-by-state test results prior to their halting of testing and tracking. The CDC did not initially respond so CBS went to all 50 states directly, asking for their statistics on state lab-confirmed H1N1 prior to the halt of individual testing and counting in July.

What did they find? CBS reported:

"The results reveal a pattern that surprised a number of health care professionals we consulted. The vast majority of cases were negative for H1N1 as well as seasonal flu, despite the fact that many states were specifically testing patients deemed to be most likely to have H1N1 flu, based on symptoms and risk factors, such as travel to Mexico."

As you can see from this CBS News graphic, not only are most cases of suspected flu-like illnesses not H1N1, they're not even the flu but more likely some type of cold or upper respiratory infection!

(Image from CBS News)

Where is the CDC Getting Their Data?

Given CBS News' findings that most cases of flu-like illnesses are neither H1N1 nor the flu, it begs the question: Why is the CDC reporting that most flu in the United States is in fact H1N1?

Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center who I spoke with in the interview above, was a consumer representative on the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee in 2003, and she asked the head of the influenza branch of the CDC how much of the flu-like illness that occurs in America every year is actually due to the flu.

The answer was about 20 percent, which corresponds more closely with the CBS News data from 2009.

According to the CBS News study, when you come down with chills, fever, cough, runny nose, malaise and all those other "flu-like" symptoms, the illness is likely caused by influenza at most 17 percent of the time and as little as 3 percent! The other 83 to 97 percent of the time it's caused by other viruses or bacteria.

So remember that not every illness that appears to be the flu actually is the flu. In fact, most of the time it's not.

Curiously, the CDC still advises those who were told they had 2009 H1N1 (and therefore should be immune to getting it again) to get vaccinated unless they had lab confirmation.

Is the CDC Purposely Misinforming the Public to Sell More Flu and H1N1 Vaccines?

Conflicts of interest are rampant in the vaccination infrastructure. The same people who are regulating and promoting vaccines are also evaluating vaccine safety.

For instance, Dr. Paul Offit of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia earned at least $29 million as part of a $182-million sale by the hospital of its worldwide royalty interest in the Merck Rotateq vaccine. He also formerly sat on the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to help create the market for rotavirus vaccine

This type of conflict of interest has been going on for some time.

In August 1999, the Committee on Government Reform initiated an investigation into Federal vaccine policy. During the investigation the Committee extensively reviewed financial disclosure forms and related documents and interviewed key officials from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the CDC.

It was revealed that many individuals on two key advisory committees had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines. These individuals were even granted waivers allowing them to fully participate in discussions about vaccine licensing and recommendations for children, despite the fact that federal law states members of advisory committees are required to disclose such ties and recuse themselves from such discussions and decisions.

Further, the investigation revealed that the FDA's and CDC's conflict of interest rules were not strongly enforced while the rules themselves were weak. Specific problems noted by the Committee included:

  • The CDC routinely granted waivers from conflict of interest rules to many members of its advisory committee.
  • Those CDC advisory committee members who were not allowed to vote on certain recommendations due to financial conflicts of interest were still allowed to actively participate in committee deliberations and advocate specific positions.
  • The Chairman of the CDC's advisory committee owned 600 shares of stock in Merck, a pharmaceutical company with an active vaccine division.
  • Members of the CDC's advisory committee often left key details out of their financial disclosure statements, and were not required to provide the missing information by CDC ethics officials.

And, when the FDA and CDC approved the controversial rotavirus vaccine in 1998 and 1999, the Committee's report said:

  • 3 out of the 5 FDA advisory committee members who voted to approve the rotavirus vaccine in December 1997 had financial ties to the pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine.
  • 4 out of the 8 CDC advisory committee members who voted to approve guidelines for the rotavirus vaccine in June 1998 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine.

The rotavirus vaccine was pulled from the market one year after approval, after it was found to cause severe bowel obstructions.

Given their sordid history, can the CDC really be trusted, even today? Do you think that much has changed in just one decade?

Is the H1N1 Vaccine Really Safe as the CDC Says it Is?

CDC officials are screaming that H1N1 is so different from the seasonal influenza strains that have circulated in the past few decades that a national alarm must be sounded and everyone needs to be so afraid that we all should get vaccinated to prevent a deadly pandemic.

Yet, they say the new H1N1 vaccine is safe based on vaccines for that very same flu strain from which it is so different. They write on their Web site "the 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccines are expected to have similar safety profiles as seasonal flu vaccines ..."

Another contradiction.

While symptoms of H1N1 flu and seasonal flu are virtually identical, the H1N1 vaccine is showing signs of being quite different from the seasonal flu shot.

Although both are produced using antiquated 50-year-old technology that involves injecting the virus into eggs and allowing it to grow, the virus being used to produce the swine flu vaccine has been found to reproduce much more slowly in eggs than the ordinary flu virus.

And according to a separate CBS News report, the U.S. government is now funding newer unprecedented technologies to speed up vaccine production, including one that involves growing the virus inside animal cells and another that involves flu proteins grown inside insect cells.

The risks of these, and the current fast-tracked swine flu vaccine, are truly unknown at this time.

There is NO Incentive for the CDC or Vaccine Manufacturers to Care About Safety

You may think that the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers must be concerned about safety, as if they released a dangerous vaccine and promoted it to the American public, imagine the lawsuits they would face.

This is actually no longer reality as the U.S. government has granted vaccine makers total legal immunity from any lawsuits that result from the new swine flu vaccine.

In fact, drug manufacturers got a major boost in protection and were granted unprecedented powers to experiment on the population with the passing of the 2006 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (the PREP Act).

This law allows the DHHS Secretary to invoke almost complete immunity from liability for manufacturers of vaccines and drugs used to combat a declared public health emergency, which the "swine flu pandemic" qualifies as.

The PREP Act removes your right to a trial jury unless you can provide clear evidence of willful misconduct that resulted in death or serious physical injury. But that's not all. First you must apply for and be granted permission to sue by the DHHS Secretary.

The most problematic aspect of the PREP Act is that it removes all financial incentive to make a safe product.

In fact, vaccine makers now have a negative incentive to test it for safety, because if they are aware of problems, then they could potentially be held liable for willful misconduct!

As long as they can prove they "didn't know" of any problem, they will not be liable for damages. Hence it's in their best interest to know as little as possible about the adverse reactions it might cause.

It seems unimaginable, but you and your children are now being enlisted as an unpaid human trial subjects for experimental, fast-tracked vaccines like the swine flu vaccine.

swine flu posters

Even if They Were Effective or Safe, Most Vaccines Will Come Too Late

Recent national polls have revealed that 30 percent to 50 percent in many communities are not planning to get a swine flu shot ... but there are many who are still ready to stand in line.

If you have not yet made up your mind and have questions, we have created some fact-filled posters that you can print and post ALL over your community, your local stores, office and schools.

You can also visit the special section of my site that is devoted to giving you all the latest H1N1 Swine Flu Alerts. This is an excellent go-to source to stay updated on all the new swine flu developments.

But I wanted to share one final detail, and that is a new study just released by Purdue University researchers and published in the journal Eurosurveillance.

The researchers found that at this point in time any vaccinations that are given in the United States will likely have little effect on the number of infections. The researchers state:

"The model predicts that there will be a significant wave in autumn, with 63% of the population being infected, and that this wave will peak so early that the planned CDC vaccination campaign will likely not have a large effect on the total number of people ultimately infected by the pandemic H1N1 influenza virus."

In other words, infections are predicted to peak in late October (now) and by the end of the year it's estimated that 63 percent of the U.S. population will have been infected with H1N1 swine flu.

What does this mean? By the end of the year the majority of the U.S. population will have likely acquired natural immunity.

Natural immunity is what you gain when you recover from influenza and natural immunity is what is protecting older Americans, who have recovered from exposure to H1N1 strains of influenza in the past and are therefore less susceptible today.

This new revelation, coupled with CBS News' finding that swine flu cases are already being greatly overestimated ... and the fact that vaccines do not offer long-term immunity anyway ... and the questionable motives behind CDC's massive vaccination campaign ... puts an entirely different slant on the swine flu "epidemic," don't you think?

If you are still concerned about the swine flu, you should know that it is relatively easy to improve your immune response to fight this infection. If 99.9% of the people are not having any serious complications from H1N1, it would seem perfectly rational to believe that minor lifestyle changes could have dramatic effects on fighting this infection, and none of these involve taking potentially dangerous and unproven vaccine interventions.

Simple Measures That Can Help You Fight Illness

  • Vitamin D has been well documented to increase the production of over 200 anti microbial peptides that fight infection.
  • Eliminate sugar from your diet as that will impair your immune response
  • Get plenty of rest
  • Exercise appropriately

You can also help make a BIG difference in protecting your right to make informed, voluntary vaccination choices by supporting the National Vaccine Information Center.
 
I have made this non-profit organization -- America's Vaccine Safety Watchdog -- one of my favorite charities and I urge you to become a donor member and help NVIC protect your informed consent rights and your children's health.

Dr. Mercola on Facebook**** Facebook Swine Flu Updates ****

Please join my Facebook Fan Page to be the first to receive updates in the future. Just click on the green button in the upper left corner.



0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Wednesday, October 21st 2009

5:32 PM

Saying goodbye to the late great United States of America

I urge you to read the below story. And you better believe I will be following this issue very closely. There is a link at the end for you to click to contact your Congressman. The link takes you to USA.gov and there you can click on State Representatives, and it will take you to a page where you can find your Congressman if you don't already know who that is. DO IT!!!! In following a lot of issues that are going on right now, I have no doubt that this won't happen and will if WE do not stand together and stop it dead in it's tracks!!!!!! Do you really want to see the demise of our nation? The Constitution? The Bill of Rights? Would you really want to leave the legacy of a world communist government for your children and grand children? If so then do nothing. It will happen without you.

This was taken from the site, "ATLAS SHRUGS", and the original article has a 4 minute video of a short segment of Lord Christopher Monckton's speech. Check out Atlas Shrugs if you have never been there. It is an excellent site!!!! Paula Geller is an amazing person that is working hard to get the message out to everyone. But it's up to YOU to act on it. God be with us all.




On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation at Bethel University in St. Paul, MN. In this 4 minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty, scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.

Lord Monckton served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate, which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" from being shown in British schools due to its inaccuracies. The judge found in favor of Monckton, ordering 9 serious errors in the film to be corrected. Lord Monckton travels internationally in an attempt to educate the public about the myth of global warming.

The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.

A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.

Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.

I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.

How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.

[laughter]

And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution, and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.

So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.

But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to it.

So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:

Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,
Is hanging breathless on thy fate!

------------------------------------- End of Speech -----------Some questions for Lord Monckton-----

Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:

Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.

Response: I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty. There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago. Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.

Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.

I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?

Response: I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that. Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind. However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.

Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.

Verifying the treaty clauses Mockton made reference to:

Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:

38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:

World Government (heading added)
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)
b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.

With Enforcement Authority (heading added)
© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; © a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].



I urge all Atlas readers immediately to contact your congressman NOW AND DEMAND that they do the job they were elected to do, keep America safe and protect her from her enemies, even if that enemy is in the White House.



0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Tuesday, October 20th 2009

5:55 PM

A Good Reason To Homeschool


0 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Monday, October 19th 2009

5:48 PM

Special Internet Alert Message - Top Priority

Wish I had seen this earlier but I just now checked my email. Please follow the link to read the whole article and see the body of the actual email. Below is the story on this latest threat. It would be a good idea to do a thorough scan of your PC with your anti-virus and then again with your anti-spyware just to make sure you are not an unwilling bot.


Special Internet Alert Message - Top Priority


Trojan being distributed via a fake Microsoft alert message with the subject line "Conflicker.B Infection Alert". The "From" line says "From: Microsoft Windows Agent" and may be followed by any email address, including your own.

Do not be fooled by this email. It is not from Microsoft. Microsoft never sends emails with attached executables or zipped files. Also, note that that "Con*ficker" is misspelled as "Con*flicker" (we have to use asterisks to keep ISPs from blocking this newsletter).

If you execute the file(s) attached to the aforementioned email, you risk infecting your computer and unknowingly making your computer a bot and part of a broad botnet. You see, these emails were not sent by a single spammer, rather they were sent by a large botnet of previously infected computers. These computers are just like yours, but they have been infected recently, or sometime in the past, with a Trojan and thus have become part of a large network of bots, controlled by an individual or groups of individuals at a remote location, and all sending the same message (the message shown above) to hundreds or thousands of email addresses. These messages are being sent surreptitiously without the knowledge of the computer's owner. If your computer becomes infected with this kind of Trojan, your computer could become a part of a similar botnet (network of bots) and send out thousands of spam or malicious emails without your knowledge.

We have received over 700 of these malicious emails since midnight last night. We're certain this threat is spreading rapidly around the Internet. It's important that you take steps so your computer is not comprised. It's not only your computer at risk but the computers of others too. Make sure you have antivirus and antispyware programs installed and updated with the very latest definitions. And remember: NEVER, EVER, EVER open an attachment from anyone unless you're absolutely sure you know who sent it. You cannot always go by the "From" address. A compromised computer can send email which appears to be from any address - including your own or one of your friends. Don't take chances. Use your common sense and good, updated antivirus and antispyware software.


And in other news LOL,...tonight is my first night back on night shift!!! WhooHoo! No more convoluted random work hours, schedule changing every week, days off changing constantly, not getting my two days off together,..... I will miss all my buds from days, but I needed to do this to ensure regular hours for home schooling. And we have good people on nights. Hard workers, and high standards. Hopefully they will have figured out my schedule when I get there tonight. I'm curious to know what days I will have off. Now I will be able to plan for vacations, time off,....And while it may mean less sleep for me, if I need to do a special errand, I will have my days to do so.

Earlier today, Sidney and I ran some errands. His shoes were still like brand new, but had gotten to where they pinched his toes. So off we went to the Mall and amazingly we found the shoes he wanted in the first store we went into. He loves them!!! They are very cushy, and extra thick around the heel. There was no contest on what kind of jacket he wanted. We headed to Aeropostle for a fur lined hoodie. Amazingly they had his size, even though they had very few, as they are a popular seller, and frequently sold out. Then we stopped and had lunch at a fast food Chinese place in the mall. He loved his food and ate it all, even though he was getting rather full LOL. We left there and went to the local WalMart, only to find that his favorite stylist was on vacation. I was terrified that he would want to bolt, when another stylist came up and we described our "problem". Sidney is at that age where he wants to grow his hair and have some length. I am at that age where I can't stand to see a head of hair from the caveman era LOL. We endeavor to compromise, but most stylists usually make him look like he had a chili bowl cut,(blunt baby look), or they cut it way short and then it sticks up everywhere. He was very pleased when we left. She managed to give it style and shape, retain a lot of the length, and his bangs weren't cut like a 2 year old's. Once we were home and it dried, he wasn't as happy with it LOL, since the bangs didn't look as "cool" as when they were still wet lol. Trying to get him to use styling products is an exercise in futility lol, but he isn't upset, and I have a son that looks presentable.

If you haven't noticed yet, I uploaded more photos recently. It was of our second trip to Cumberland Gap. Wish we could go back and spend an entire week! Take care and I hope to be back soon. GBU!



0 Comment(s) / Post Comment